Buffalo, United States, 7th May 2026 - A new and heartfelt release, Through A Child’s Eyes, offers readers a deeply reflective journey into the world as seen through innocence, imagination, and spiritual awareness. Written by George Leonard Hayes, this moving story captures the quiet beauty of childhood while uncovering profound truths about life, gratitude, and the presence of something greater than ourselves.The book follows a young voice as it navigates everyday experiences, from playful moments in nature to the challenges of family, school, and change. Through vivid imagery and honest thoughts, the story reveals how a child senses peace and harmony in ways that adults often overlook. That sense of wonder becomes a guiding thread, reminding readers of the importance of stillness, perspective, and connection beyond what is visible.As the story moves forward, moments of joy begin to mix with confusion, discomfort, and real-life struggles. Encounters with family tension, social pressures, and even unexpected tragedy gently shape a growing awareness. The message is clear: gratitude is not always understood until life shifts, and that faith and perspective can transform how we see the world.Through A Child’s Eyes is more than a story. It is a quiet reminder to slow down, to reflect, and to reconnect with the simple truths that often get lost along the way.About The AuthorGeorge Leonard Hayes brings authenticity and depth to his writing, drawing from a life rooted in purpose and service. Born in Washington DC, raised in Maryland, and now based in Georgia, he has spent much of his life working with youth through education, counseling, and mentoring. His early path as a boxer, combined with years of guiding young people, has given him a grounded and compassionate outlook.His writing journey began in 2009, sparked by a deep sense of spiritual inspiration. What started with poetry has grown into a meaningful expression of life lessons centered on faith, growth, and understanding. Hayes believes that placing God at the center of everything brings clarity and purpose, a belief that echoes throughout his work. Media Contact Organization: Kinetic Digital Publishers Contact Person: Emma Parker Website: https://www.kineticdigitalpublishers.com/ Email: Send Email Contact Number: +15103980823 Address:4498 Main St Suite 4 # 1697 Buffalo, NY 14226 City: Buffalo Country:United States Release id:44785 The post Through A Child’s Eyes by George Leonard Hayes Shares a Thoughtful Look at Life, Faith, and Growing Up appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
“Lola & Flo: A Magical Journey of Names and Places” by Sandeep Arkh blends storytelling, culture, and emotion into a timeless tale of identity and love New York, United States, 7th May 2026 - In a world where children’s books often lean on simple narratives and fleeting entertainment, Lola & Flo: A Magical Journey of Names and Places offers something deeper: a story that connects identity, family, and the magic of belonging.Written by Sandeep Arkh, this beautifully illustrated children’s book invites readers into the lives of two sisters—Lola and Flo—whose names are more than just words. They are gateways to discovery, culture, and self-understanding.From the very beginning, the book establishes its emotional core—love, family, and the quiet magic of everyday moments. Set against the warmth of a lakeside home and the glow of shared memories, the story unfolds with a sense of intimacy that resonates with both children and adults. Where Names Become DestinationsWhat sets Lola & Flo apart is its imaginative premise: names are not just labels—they are stories waiting to be explored.When the sisters discover a magical library and a glowing compass, they are transported into a series of breathtaking journeys across the world. From the icy beauty of Iceland’s mountains to the vibrant streets of Italy, Spain, and India, each destination reveals a new layer of meaning behind their names. These journeys are not just visual adventures—they are emotional ones. Each place reflects a part of who the girls are, teaching them that identity is shaped by culture, history, and connection.A Story Rooted in Love and BelongingAt its heart, the book is not about travel—it is about home.The narrative gently reminds readers that no matter how far one journeys, the strongest connection is always to family. The recurring imagery of the firepit, shared laughter, and the presence of loved ones creates a sense of grounding that ties the entire story together. In one of the book’s most touching themes, love is portrayed as something that transcends time and space—something that continues to guide, protect, and illuminate.A Visual and Emotional ExperienceBeyond its storytelling, Lola & Flo stands out for its rich, cinematic illustrations. Each page feels like a moment captured in light—from glowing northern skies to colorful festivals and golden cityscapes.These visuals don’t just complement the story—they elevate it, creating an immersive experience that draws readers into the world of the two sisters.More Than a Children’s BookWhile written for young readers, Lola & Flo carries a message that resonates across generations. It speaks to parents, families, and anyone who has ever wondered about the meaning behind their own name and story.It is a book about:Identity and self-discovery Cultural appreciation The enduring power of family The belief that love is the greatest magic of all A Lasting MessageAs the story comes full circle, the message becomes clear:the greatest journey is not across the world but within ourselves and the people we love.With its blend of imagination, emotion, and cultural richness, Lola & Flo: A Magical Journey of Names and Places positions itself as more than a bedtime story—it is a keepsake, a conversation starter, and a reminder of the magic that lives in every name.About the AuthorSandeep Arkh is a storyteller dedicated to creating meaningful narratives that blend imagination with emotional depth. Through Lola & Flo, he brings together themes of family, identity, and global exploration in a way that resonates with readers of all ages. Media Contact Organization: USA Publishing Hub Contact Person: Steve Harper Website: https://usapublishinghub.com/ Email: Send Email Contact Number: +12677145850 Address:353 Lexington Avenue Address 2: 6th Floor Suite #603-PMB City: New York State: New York Country:United States Release id:44788 The post A Children’s Book That Turns Names Into Journeys and Family Into Magic appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
AOULINK, a flagship decentralized finance ecosystem that has undergone thorough auditing and strategic alignment by the global AICG governance hub, Interstellar Alliance, officially launched globally on May 5, 2026 at 19:00 (UTC+8) / 11:00 (GMT). As a decentralized infrastructure that deeply integrates "high-performance transactional infrastructure" and "full-scenario financial modules", the launch of AOULINK marks the official departure of on-chain interaction from inefficient and fragmented discrete protocol games, and the entry into a "standardized growth" stage protected by institutional-level audit standards. AOULINK Core Value Analysis Based on the FERGS Audit Standard of the Interstellar Alliance The Project Evaluation Center (PEC) of the Interstellar Alliance utilized the FERGS penetrating audit framework to conduct a multi-dimensional assessment of AOULINK's underlying logic and business efficiency. The audit results show that AOULINK possesses significant generational advantages in asset certainty and growth logic: Algorithm-driven sustainability: an endogenous reward mechanism that rejects short-term stimulus (Fundamentals) AOULINK has fundamentally restructured the revenue order of traditional platforms. Based on the FERGS sustainability audit criteria, AOULINK enforces a 90/10 profit distribution agreement: 90% of the core value generated by the system, such as transaction fees, funding rates, and liquidation proceeds, is directly returned to liquidity providers (LPs) through immutable smart contracts. This "endogenous profitability" logic ensures that the ecosystem does not rely on short-term market subsidies or single-ecosystem growth, possessing extremely strong cross-cycle operation capabilities and long-term stability. Full-scenario integrated execution capabilities: Deterministic delivery based on real-world application paths (Execution) Unlike the common protocol patchwork model in the market, the AOULINK team has demonstrated a strong certainty of commercialization. The ecosystem comprises modules covering all scenarios, including perpetual contracts, lending systems, hedging and quantitative strategies, and a community ecosystem. This deep integration of "foundation + self-operated applications" significantly reduces the losses from cross-protocol interactions, proving the team's closed-loop delivery capability from top-level design to end-user execution, and a clear value-driven path. Physical-level access control for fund security: Risk isolation and self-control system (Risk) Security is the fundamental red line of AOULINK's asset architecture. The ecosystem's built-in risk hedging quantitative engine captures external market arbitrage opportunities in real time, smooths internal position imbalances, and establishes the asset's hedging capabilities in extreme market environments. Simultaneously, AOULINK adheres to the physical logic of "private key self-holding," ensuring clear and transparent fund flows with physical-level access control mechanisms. This fundamentally eliminates the credit default risks of traditional centralized custody, ensuring assets are securely controlled within the rules. The scalability of mechanisms under global collaboration: a growth model that can be replicated across regions As a flagship project in the Web3 finance sector selected by the Interstellar Alliance, AOULINK has secured strategic collaboration with top 100 core teams globally. Through standardized, industrialized execution pathways, AOULINK's consensus mechanism and business logic can be efficiently transmitted across four continents: Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. This mechanism does not rely on local resources but achieves exponential scaling across groups and regions through standardized operating procedures (SOPs), establishing extremely strong value potential. Market absorption capacity of high-performance bases: supporting the steady-state (scale) of systems with large-scale, high-frequency interactions Addressing the latency issues commonly found in on-chain finance, AOULINK has achieved millisecond-level response times by reconstructing the physical execution layer. This high-performance transactional public chain foundation ensures that the system maintains stable revenue distribution and conversion efficiency even when facing large-scale user onboarding and extremely high concurrency interactions. Audits have verified that AOULINK has the throughput capacity to support diverse global markets, ensuring that the overall ecosystem operates smoothly and without instability during large-scale expansion. About the Interstellar Alliance Interstellar Alliance is the world's first value collaboration system driven by AICG (Intelligent Co-governance). By codifying governance logic and digitizing decision-making processes, the Alliance connects with top-tier global strategic capital firms (such as Standard Crypto, ParaFi Capital, and DCG), aiming to reshape the business order in the digital age. Leveraging six functional centers and a global team of 100 executives, the Alliance seeks to eliminate the efficiency losses caused by discrete game theory, providing global value seekers with project selection, risk control, and growth pathways. About AOULINK AOULINK is a decentralized finance ecosystem built on a high-performance transactional public blockchain, integrating perpetual contracts, lending, hedging quantitative strategies, and a community ecosystem. It aims to construct a transparent, secure, and sustainable decentralized value ecosystem network through technological innovation and mechanism restructuring. Media Contact: Media Relations Global News Online New York NY United States https://www.globalnewsonline.info
Recently, Mr. Hu Jiaqi, Founder and Chairman of the Humanitas Ark, held an academic dialogue with visiting Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, Professor Michael Levitt, on the theme of “Technology and the Future of Humanity.” The two sides had an in-depth exchange of views on a number of topics. In this collision of ideas between top scholars, we witnessed the convergence of science and humanities, reason and compassion. In this era of accelerating technological iteration, humanity’s future requires more visionaries to safeguard it. Only by setting aside differences and starting from the common interests of humanity can we achieve the sustainable survival and universal well-being of humankind. Below is the complete dialogue between Chairman Hu Jiaqi and Professor Levitt. For ease of viewing, the content has been minimally edited, while preserving the original arguments and thought processes of both speakers to the greatest extent possible. Mr. Hu Jiaqi is the world’s early pioneer in the systematic study of technological crises and a key architect of its theoretical framework. He has long been committed to raising public awareness of technological risks, calling for rational constraints on technological development, and firmly advocating strict controls on high-risk technologies. Professor Michael Levitt, a Nobel laureate who has made milestone contributions to the scientific field, developed the “multiscale models for complex chemical systems,” which successfully bridged the gap between classical physics and quantum physics, turning computer simulations of chemical reactions from concept into reality, and profoundly influencing the development of modern chemistry and life sciences. When a thinker who maintains a cautious stance toward technology meets a pioneer who has achieved breakthroughs in basic science, what sparks of thought will emerge from this collision of perspectives? Now, let us dive into the full transcript of this top-level dialogue. I. Exchange on Hu Jiaqi’s Academic Theoretical Framework Hu Jiaqi: Professor, we would like to divide this into two aspects. First, let me introduce my basic viewpoints and research. Then we can discuss some questions. If you disagree with some of my views, that’s fine – we can discuss and exchange ideas. Today’s theme is Technology and the Future of Humanity: A Dialogue with Nobel Laureate Michael Levitt. I am here today as the Founder and Chairman of the Humanitas Ark. I would like to outline the general scope of my research over these many years. (pointing to the PPT) My academic theoretical framework can be roughly illustrated in this diagram. I have devoted my life to the study of human issues for nearly half a century — 47 years, to be precise. In the early stage, I spent 28 years completing this 800,000-word book, Saving Humanity (pointing to the two volumes of Saving Humanity), which was published in China in 2007. After that, I wrote other books, published some articles, wrote letters, and gave speeches, interviews, and produced videos. All my work on human-related issues follows this theoretical framework. Now let me introduce this theoretical framework. (pointing to the PPT) My entire research stems from two core questions: 1.The overall survival of humanity. 2.The universal well-being of humanity. I believe these are the two greatest issues; there are no issues greater than these. Regarding the overall survival of humanity, through rigorous and systematic argument,I have reached the following conclusion: if science and technology continue to develop as they are now, they will inevitably lead to the extinction of humanity – within two to three hundred years at the longest, or within this century at the shortest. I will explain my reasoning later, and we can discuss it. This means science and technology cannot continue developing in this way. We must solve this problem. Therefore, this is the main topic I want to discuss with you today. The second issue is the universal well-being of humanity.Science and technology have created immense wealth, but they have not brought universal happiness to humanity. This is not my own statement; it comes from historians. For instance, L.S. Stavrianos mentions in A Global History that human happiness today is even less than that of people in the Paleolithic Age when they first emerged from caves. Other historians have expressed similar views, drawing on archaeological evidence.Perhaps we can explore this topic in depth another time, but it is not the main focus of our discussion today. Throughout my research, everything is based on human nature. I believe that humans are a specific species. We are not gods or immortals; we are simply human beings. Human nature can be guided, but it cannot be fundamentally changed. Any social system designed against human nature will inevitably fail, in my view. We have seen examples of such failures in China’s history. Based on human nature, I have established three major principles: the Principle of Maximum Value, the Principle of Justice, and the Principle of Far-sightedness. These three principles constitute the methodology for all my research. I can explain what these three principles mean later if time permits. During the research process, we find that if we violate these three principles, our research conclusions might be erroneous. First, we must all agree on the correctness of these three principles.The methodology I have constructed aims to ultimately solve three problems. The first is the overall survival of humanity. What is the solution and path to resolving this issue? (pointing to the PPT) As I said, if science and technology continue developing in this way, they will quickly lead to human extinction. How should we solve this? I believe the fundamental solution is to achieve the Great Unification of humanity and strictly restrict the development of science and technology. We should only popularize safe and mature technologies globally. The implementation path is: (pointing to the PPT) First, strive in the present: We must take various actions now to avoid technological catastrophes. For example, there is currently the “alignment theory” proposed by Yudkowsky. I think it is useful, but not significantly so — having it is better than having nothing. Second, promote an awakening movement: Promote a global awakening movement, encouraging humanity to re-evaluate science and technology. Third, through the awakening movement, achieve the Great Unification of humanity. Then, strictly restrict the development of science and technology, permanently seal up and even cause to be forgotten high-risk technologies, especially scientific theories. Rebuild our social systems, restructuring society to achieve the perpetual survival of humanity. This is the path to solving the problem of ‘the overall survival of humanity. The second issue is universal well-being. I have constructed a social framework: to establish a peaceful, friendly, equitably prosperous, and non-competitive society. I believe such a society is most conducive to achieving universal well-being. At the same time, such a society also contributes to the stability of a unified world. The third issue (pointing to the PPT), we also need to address other issues derived from the overall survival and universal well-being of humanity. This encompasses all my research, whether it’s the 800,000-word book Saving Humanity, or other books and articles I have written — all operate within this overarching framework. That concludes my first point. After hearing this, Professor, do you have any questions you would like to discuss with me? Levitt: I understand this very well.I’m not sure that i agree with everything, but i certainly understand what you said. We could go on. II. “The Three Principles” — An Exchange on Hu Jiaqi’s Methodology Hu Jiaqi: Alright. Let me briefly explain my methodology – the three principles. First is the Principle of Maximum Value. I believe that the most important values for humanity are, first, survival, and second, well-being. And the overall weight of humanity as a whole is the greatest. Therefore, the holistic survival of humanity overrides all. When the interests of individuals, nations, or countries conflict with the overall survival of humanity, they must unconditionally submit to the latter. A key slogan of our philosophy is: the holistic survival of humanity overrides all! You can see this written on the flyleaf of my book: “the holistic survival of humanity overrides all.” If someone disagrees with this principle, it is very likely that my subsequent conclusions would be erroneous. Levitt: I agree with that. Hu Jiaqi: Good. Second is the Principle of Justice. The Principle of Justice means that different human groups and individuals, as well as different generations, should enjoy equal and equitable rights to survival security, the right to pursue well-being, and the right to resource allocation. This is the Principle of Justice. If someone believes they must enjoy more than others, that violates the Principle of Justice. If someone disagrees with the Principle of Justice, many of our research conclusions might also be opposite. This is my second principle. Third is the Principle of Farsightedness. The Principle of Far-sightedness means that when studying human issues, we must consider sufficiently long time scales and sufficiently broad spatial scales. Decision-making must abandon short-sighted thinking and fully consider the impact of actions on future generations. This “sufficiency” goes beyond ordinary imagination. Our human species could potentially survive on Earth for hundreds of millions of years. Dinosaurs survived on Earth for 160 million years, and nautiluses have survived for 530 million years. They survived so long because they were strong, and we humans are even stronger than them. If we do not consider issues from such a distant perspective, it is very likely that we, a powerful humanity, will eventually cause our own demise. In my research, my time scale extends from the beginning of the universe to its end, and my spatial scale extends from beneath our feet to the edge of the universe. My research covers this vast scope. When we research with such a scope, it is not to do something at the edge of the universe, nor to do something billions of years away in the future. Rather, we use this scope as a reference point to solve our present issues. Therefore, the Principle of Farsightedness is not an ethereal, futuristic action plan. It merely uses this perspective as a method to research what we need to do now. These are the three principles I have established, which form the methodology for all my research. Professor, you can raise any questions anytime, either now or after I finish speaking. Levitt: I understand very well. III. The Methodology for Arguing that Technology Could Lead to Human Extinction Hu Jiaqi: Now, let’s focus on the main topic I want to discuss with you. (pointing to the PPT)the issue that many people find difficult to accept: my assertion that the continued development of science and technology will inevitably lead to human extinction soon, within two to three hundred years at the longest, or within this century at the shortest. How do I argue this? I use a method combining Path Analysis and Defense Limit Testing. Proving that technology will cause human extinction is difficult; it cannot be falsified, cannot be tested through repetition, and we only have a single sample – our Earth and our one humanity. Therefore, it’s hard to use other methods of argument. Some scientists use probabilistic methods, but I am not very favorable towards them. I find it less scientific. Let me give a simple example: the overall survival of humanity is incomparably important.Even if the probability is one in ten thousand, multiplied by infinity, it is still approximately infinity — so it cannot be done.Even if the probability is one in a million, multiplied by infinity, it is still approximately infinity.That is why I do not appreciate the approach of calculating the probability of technological extinction of humanity. Take, for example, Toby Ord from Oxford University.He believes that within one hundred years, the probability of technological extinction is one in six.Hinton, an important contributor to generative artificial intelligence,believes that within forty years, the probability of generative AI spiraling out of control is twenty to thirty percent. I am skeptical about the scientific validity of his sample.If we were to take his sample seriously, then we must stop artificial intelligence immediately.Because one-sixth is about sixteen percent, and sixteen percent multiplied by infinity is still infinity.Hinton’s twenty to thirty percent, multiplied by infinity, is still approximately infinity.This cannot be done. So I believe that method is unscientific.Perhaps I am wrong; this is just my personal view, open for discussion. Therefore, although technological extinction cannot be falsified, cannot be observed,and the experiment cannot be replicated,extinction risk can still be partially verified and assessed. Thus, my argument regarding human extinction is approached through two methods combined:extinction pathway analysis and defense limit testing. How does this argument unfold? My starting point is this: (pointing to the PPT) First, technological development inevitably leads to an increase in the destructive power of tools. For instance, in the primitive era, during the Old Stone Age, people used stones and sticks to chase wild animals.These also served as tools for human combat, but their efficiency was very low. Later came the age of cold weapons, where a sword or a spear could kill one person at a time.Then gunpowder was invented, giving rise to explosive shells,which could injure many people with a single blast. Later came the mass-energy equivalence equation, which led to nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons can destroy an entire city. So, as science and technology advance, destructive power increases — this is common sense.It needs no proof; it is a historical fact. I argue this in five steps. This is the first step. My second step is that since the Industrial Revolution, technological development has rapidly approached the capacity for extinction. In fact, the acceleration of technological progress began with the Industrial Revolution. Before the Industrial Revolution, development was slow.The acceleration began in the mid-18th century with the Industrial Revolution and has grown exponentially. In just over two hundred years, humanity has developed science and technology to its current height. As mentioned, nuclear weapons are already extremely powerful. Today, we have genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence. Many scientists are now concerned that the further development of these technologies — and their destructive potential —is no longer about how many people could be injured or killed.The concern about safety itself is whether they could cause human extinction. We have reached this point. Although these technologies cannot yet cause extinction, they are approaching that capability.And time is accelerating; the future will only move faster, not slower.This is the second step of my argument. The third step is that as long as technology continues to develop uncontrollably, the destructive power of these tools will inevitably grow even greater,until eventually extinction-level means emerge. What is the reasoning behind this? Even if today’s nuclear technology, genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence cannot lead to extinction,as long as technology continues to advance, something even more powerful will emerge.That something will eventually possess the capability to end humanity. And after the first extinction-level technology appears, newer ones will follow.These new extinction technologies will increasingly become accessible even to corporations — or even to individual scientists.While the actions of a nation are somewhat controllable,the actions of individuals are very difficult to control. There are always people willing to commit extreme evil. The fourth step is that extinction-level means cannot be neutralized — they cannot be defended against. Some means simply cannot be countered.Take nuclear weapons: once a nuclear explosion occurs, it happens; casualties occur;there is no way to neutralize nuclear energy — no such mechanism exists. But some means can be countered. For example, if a virus is released causing a pandemic, corresponding drugs can be developed to treat it —this can be counteracted.However, even when neutralization is possible,any countermeasure requires time for development and deployment.During this time lag, humanity is exposed to the threat of extinction. As extinction-level means multiply, and as the variety of such means increases,and given that humanity’s future is extremely long,this time window will be infinitely expanded.Even if neutralization is possible — perhaps even nuclear weapons could eventually be neutralized —the process of research and development still takes time. Because of this time lag, and because the period without effective countermeasures is prolonged,humanity will be exposed to the threat of existing extinction-level means without solutions for a very long time.Over time, disaster is inevitable. This is what I call defense limit testing.Assuming all means can be countered, there is still a research process involved. That is the fourth step. And what is the fifth step? (pointing to the PPT) The fifth step is that the outbreak of extinction-level forces is inevitable. Science and technology are inherently uncertain.What we often consider beneficial may turn out to be the most harmful.Moreover, the dark side of human nature means there will always be people seeking to commit extreme evil —every era has such individuals.Once technology reaches the level capable of causing human extinction,extinction forces will inevitably erupt. There are three pathways: First, extreme means could be maliciously used by evil individuals. Second, accidents in laboratories could lead to the release of extinction-level forces.Extinction-level technologies are advanced, and advanced technologies carry even greater uncertainty.Scientific research is an exploration of the unknown, and since it is unknown, there are things we do not yet understand.When technology reaches a very high level, something unknown could emerge from that realm — a monster that could annihilate humanity.That is the second pathway. The third pathway is the unintended misuse of technological products. Many technologies, such as Freon, were initially considered beneficial, but their use led to ozone depletion. Such situations will become increasingly common. Through these five steps, I have completed my pathway analysis and defense limit testing. Pathway analysis — this is the pathway. (pointing to the PPT) Defense limits (pointing to the PPT) — I assume that all means can be countered. But developing countermeasures takes time,and humanity’s future is extremely long, so the window period without effective defense becomes very long.And because the overall survival of humanity is incomparably important,in addressing this issue, it is not just a matter of simple conclusions —it is also a matter of decision-making logic. This (technological development) cannot continue. That is my argument. Professor, is there anything you would like to discuss with me? Shall we discuss first, or shall I continue with the presentation? Levitt: Overall, I agree with your views. For example, technology does carry certain risks, and the future also holds certain risks. But the future is unknown. We know that human extinction in the future could be caused by technological factors. However, it could also be caused by other factors. For instance, natural forces are a very important factor. So the possibility of extinction could also come from nature in the future. IV. Natural Threats to Human Extinction Hu Jiaqi: My argument on human extinction is actually divided into two parts. In this presentation, I am only discussing technological extinction.I have also extensively studied natural threats to human extinction, covering approximately 200,000 words. I classify natural extinction threats into several levels. The first level is the cosmic level.Cosmic-level threats are those from which humanity cannot escape, such as the end of the universe.The end of the universe is an unavoidable fate for humanity. It is a foregone conclusion. Other examples include black hole accretion, supernova explosions,the potential accretion of micro black holes,independent planet impacts, and alien invasions.These are cosmic-level dangers. My conclusion is that these events are either billions of years away,or their probability is so extremely small that it can be ignored. That is the cosmic level. The second level is threats within the solar system. One of these is unavoidable: in about five billion years, the sun will become a red giant.It will expand dramatically, and humanity cannot escape unless we emigrate beyond the solar system. Another threat is large asteroid impacts.However, the probability of such impacts is extremely small. The prevailing view is that a ten-kilometer-diameter asteroid struck the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico and caused the extinction of the dinosaurs.But I believe that a ten-kilometer asteroid might have caused dinosaur extinction, but it would not have wiped out humans. Human survival capability is far stronger than that of dinosaurs.We are not defenseless against nature, nor do we simply gather food; we produce it creatively.Thus, ordinary asteroid impacts cannot cause human extinction.An asteroid over one hundred kilometers in diameter might be able to cause extinction— though I still doubt it could. Such events happen only once every hundreds of millions of years.Within the solar system, there are other factors,such as solar activity — sunspots, magnetic storms — and reversals of Earth’s magnetic field,which could leave us vulnerable to cosmic rays for a period of time. However, threats at the solar system level are either many billions of years away,or extremely low in probability,or simply incapable of causing extinction.So solar system-level threats are not something to be overly concerned about.That is my second level. The third level is Earth-level dangers. For example, super-volcanoes and super-earthquakes.In history, entire oceans have been polluted, leading to several mass extinctions.There are also extreme climate fluctuations — times when polar ice melted completely,and times when even the equator was covered in ice.But none of these are sufficient to cause human extinction.They may kill many people, but not all of humanity.Human survival capabilities are too strong.In winter, we enjoy heating indoors; in summer, we use air conditioning.We use technology to cultivate food in any environment —even in the Arctic Circle, food can be grown in greenhouses.So while such events may cause many deaths, they cannot lead to human extinction. That is within the Earth-level category. The fourth level includes threats related to evolutionary patterns and biology,such as super-viruses, super-bacteria,and even the possibility of human degeneration. These could cause many deaths, but they cannot lead to extinction.My definition of human extinction is that not a single individual remains.So my conclusion is that natural threats are either billions of years away,or their probability is so low that they can be entirely ignored. That is the case with natural threats. V. Human-Caused Threats to Extinction Hu Jiaqi: The second major category is threats originating from humanity itself. I have also analyzed these extensively.Science and technology are just one factor, but they are the decisive factor.Compared to this factor, all others pale in significance — its weight is enormous.In terms of causing human extinction, the timeline is long at most two to three hundred years, and short within this century. As Hinton said, the probability of AI spiraling out of control within forty years is twenty to thirty percent.Is that probability high or low?The overall survival of humanity is incomparably important —it is above all else, it is an infinite value.An infinite value multiplied by twenty to thirty percent is still infinite.This is what Hinton, a leading figure in generative AI, said. As a decision-maker, this is not a scientific question;it is a philosophical question of decision-making.When faced with a twenty to thirty percent chance of human extinction in the next forty years,what decision do you make? Stop or continue? As I mentioned earlier,Toby Ord, the Oxford philosopher,said that the probability of technological extinction within a hundred years is one in six, about sixteen percent.I do not know how he calculated that.But once this probability is known, do you feel a sense of fear? Sixteen percent is very large —multiplied by infinity, it remains infinite. Can we continue moving forward? Professor, feel free to interrupt with any questions. Ⅵ. Discussion on Restricting Technological Development Levitt: (pointing to the axis drawn by Levitt himself) Two million years ago, human beings emerged. This is the timeline (horizontal axis), from two million years ago to the present. And this axis (vertical axis) represents the advancement of civilization, population growth, and technological development. Some human species have gone extinct: Neanderthals, and others — this is history. We can ask the question: how likely is the extinction of Homo sapiens? In the early days, extinction was easy, because technology was primitive and the population was small. We can also look at how species go extinct. Before agriculture, before animal domestication — this is where technology begins: farming, domestication, and so on. Technology made it easier to survive asteroid impacts and volcanic eruptions. With farming, the population grew, and technology made them harder to wipe out. Now I would like to ask Mr. Hu a question: If you could go back in time and stop technological development, at what point would you choose to stop it? Hu Jiaqi: Alright, let me respond to this question. In the early days, humans were very vulnerable.Their vulnerable is reflected in two aspects when facing nature.First, the population was too small.Second, their ability to cope with nature was too weak. When I say humans, I mean Homo sapiens. There is still some debate about when the evolution of Homo sapiens was completed,but it is generally believed to have been completed between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. When I wrote this book Saving Humanity, I wrote that Homo sapiens completed evolution around 50,000 to 60,000 years ago,because that was the information I had at the time. It has now been twenty years since I finished writing the book.Over these twenty years, there have been many new discoveries and archaeological excavations,pushing the timeline back — The new estimate suggests that Homo sapiens completed evolution 100,000–200,000 years ago. About 10,000 years ago, humanity entered the agricultural era. Entering the agricultural era was predicated on the domestication of animals and plants. Archaeologists have discovered a phenomenon: thousands of years before humans settled down and entered the agricultural era, they already had the ability to do so. Their intelligence was sufficient, and they could already domesticate some animals and plants. So why did they delay entering the agricultural era for several thousand years? This is a perspective from Stavrianos. The evidence I just mentioned also cites the research conclusions of two famous American archaeologists. Stavrianos’s explanation is that although humans were still in the Paleolithic era at that time, they had enough food, and they could enjoy a leisurely lifestyle. He believed that the leisure time of people back then was even greater than that of archaeologists today. People back then did not worry about food. Their level of food security was even higher than it is today.I experienced the Cultural Revolution, and at that time, people were starving to death. Stavrianos clearly elaborates on these points in his A Global History. And other historians also discussed this issue. This actually brings me to my second topic. I won’t discuss the second topic with you today, because we may not even finish the first one. As I mentioned at the beginning, my research is approached from two angles. The first issue is the holistic survival of humanity.The second issue is the general well-being of humanity. Science and technology have created infinite wealth, but failed to brought universal happiness to humanity. If there is an opportunity in the future, we can discuss the second issue as well.But today, let us focus only on the first topic. Now, let me answer your question. Once humans entered the agricultural era, it became very difficult for natural forces to wipe them out. The reasons are as follows: First, the human population became larger. Second, humans were already able to creatively obtain a great deal of food. When ordinary natural forces could no longer wipe out humanity, the main threat to humans came from ourselves. Levitt: If we stop the technology here, we would increase extinction.This extinction is from earth threats. Also there is extinction from solar threats, as you say, also extinction from cosmic threats. Maybe if we look at the future, we would also have other dangers, and if we stop technology, it will be easier for us to be extinct, rather than difficult to be extinct. Hu Jiaqi: Alright, let me respond. In fact, after humans entered the agricultural era,first, humans could not yet cause their own extinction. The means were too primitive —in the age of cold weapons, one sword or one arrow could only kill one person. It was impossible to wipe out all of humanity. Levitt: I mean,the plague of the 5th century, viruses are killing fifty percent. We could be extinct, we were very lucky. Hu Jiaqi: On this point,I may have a slightly different view from yours. I believe that plagues are closely related to population density.For example, during the 14th century, the Black Death in Europe killed a large number of people. But the Jews survived the plague. Why?Because the Jews lived in their own separate communities Having very little interaction with others. They could maintain hygiene and manage their environment well. So the Jews survived the Black Death, while other Europeans did not. Whether it’s a plague, a bacterium, or a virus,Its spread is closely related to population density.A naturally occurring plague, at its worst, might kill 99% of humanity — but the remaining 1% could still survive. Because I have a definition: when I talk about extinction, I mean: not a single person remains — there is no possibility for humanity to come back. In my book, I define extinction as no individuals left, just like the dinosaurs — When there is not a single individual left, this species has no future. For example, during a certain period in China— the Eastern Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties — how many people died in northern China? Seventy to eighty percent died, leaving only twenty to thirty percent. Most of that was due to slaughter. Do you know the term “two-legged sheep”? When there was no military rations, those ten thousand people became your rations. The common people were eaten. And there was even a preference for taste — young children tasted best, then women, then men, and finally the elderly — the elderly were the least tasty. China has two such periods in its history:One is the Sixteen Kingdoms period of the Eastern Jin.The other is the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period.These two periods are the most brutal in Chinese history. There was literal cannibalism. When there was no military food, people were allocated as rations. Levitt: What year was it? Hu Jiaqi: It was before the Song Dynasty — the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms occurred between the Tang and Song dynasties. But that was not the worst. The worst was the northern region during the Eastern Jin and Sixteen Kingdoms period.That’s how miserable northern China was. Levitt: What year was it? Hu Jiaqi: Between 300 AD and 430 AD. This was the darkest period in Chinese history.In less than a hundred years, the population dropped by seventy to eighty percent. Pandemics stop when population density decreases, because the transmission routes are cut off.Just like with COVID-19 a few years ago — why did we need quarantine? It was to stop people from moving around. There are three possible ways a pandemic can stop:First, herd immunity.Second, when the density becomes low enough, it stops on its own.Third, the development of effective treatments. So a pandemic cannot go on forever — unless it is specifically designed to do so — it cannot kill humans indefinitely.When the transmission density becomes very low, it loses its ability to kill.That’s the nature of pandemics. Ⅶ. The Optimal Time to Limit Technological Development Levitt: (pointing to the axis drawn by Levitt himself) If we stop here, if civilization stop here (referring to the Stone Age). It is bad. Hu Jiaqi: Actually, I would not advocate stopping civilization at this point.If I were a person living at that time, I might feel happy.But having come this far, I don’t want to go back.Why?Because people back then lived a very hard life.Although they were better off than other animals by comparison, their standard of living is incomparable to that of modern humans. Levitt: What will happen later, we actually don’t know. Hu Jiaqi: This is what I was just saying — we need to reason it through. The claim that technology could end humanity is unfalsifiable. Levitt: I agree.But what also would be possible is that there is a non-human technology that will destroy humankind if we don’t develop our own technology.Have you read the book Three Body? Three Body, the science fiction.The network through the threat from another civilization ,They need to develop technology to fight against the threat. If we stop technology, what would happen? I don’t know. Hu Jiaqi: I have read the book: The Three-Body Problem.I’ve watched the TV series too.It was written by the Chinese author Liu Cixin.It has a strong sci-fi sensibility.But I think I am doing scientific research, not science fiction. Levitt: You’ve also talked a lot about happiness. Hu Jiaqi: Professor, let me finish what I wanted to say. Let me complete my argument.I believe it would have been better if humanity had stopped two hundred years ago.More or less — two hundred years ago would have been quite good. By then, humans had solved the problem of food. For a long time, even after entering agricultural civilization,we hadn’t truly solved food security.It was only after the Industrial Revolution that productivity exploded.That productivity was tied to relatively simple tools —tools that were intuitive.The more hidden technologies are, the easier they can harm humanity.The less hidden, the more intuitive — and then easier to use for good. So I think fifty years after the Industrial Revolution would have been enough —That would have been the optimal period.By then, we had solved food and clothing.Look at the spinning machine —Before that, weaving cloth was very slow, productivity very low.Rice planting was done by hand.Transport was primitive — horse-drawn carriages. I believe the key turning point on which the potential for human extinction to appear is when Einstein’s mass-energy equation was proposed.that’s when people realized just how enormous the energy contained in science and technology could be.But we can’t take 1905 (referring to the year he introduced the mass-energy equivalence equation) as the cutoff point for restricting technological development we would need to push it back.There should be a safety period. There’s no perfect 100% safe period, but I would prefer to set the cutoff at fifty years after the Industrial Revolution.By then, people had solved food and clothing.It was also very safe.Compared to earlier times, there was happiness.Happiness is born from comparison — that is my conclusion. Levitt: In that time that you would like to stop technology,there are still many many children are died,many women are treated very badly,It is the time when many people are very unhappy Hu Jiaqi: I agree.First, regarding the many children dying from illness —that just means technology hadn’t reached a high enough level.If humanity wants to survive forever, certain sacrifices must be made.Without sacrifices, it’s impossible to ensure humanity’s eternal survival. That’s my first point. Second, regarding women not being treated fairly —that is a matter of social systems.Social system issues need to be discussed using a different kind of logic.In fact, even today, gender inequality still exists around the world.That problem has not been fully resolved — just like Black people in America. By the 1960s, it had already been a hundred years since Lincoln called for the emancipation of black slaves.Yet Martin Luther King Jr. was still there, delivering his “I Have a Dream” speech. So these things take time — that’s a separate issue.If we want to discuss that, it would be a second discussion.This is the first discussion we are having. Ⅷ. How to Limit Technological Development Levitt: Let’s discuss something different. Let’s say if we like to stop technology development. It seems to me that it is impossible to do that. Hu Jiaqi: This is quite difficult, but I have my own approach. First, let me make a point: the expansion of human political entities is a major trend. In ancient times, there were only tens of thousands of humans.China’s first dynasty was the Xia Dynasty, which covered only a small part of today’s southern Shanxi and northwestern Henan.The Shang Dynasty was a bit larger, and the Zhou Dynasty larger still.Then Qin Shi Huang unified China, making it even larger.The same pattern happened around the world. Look at China today — 1.4 billion people, such a vast territory. Russia is even larger.And the former British Empire, right? The expansion of the British Empire, the expansion of the Mongols, right?At one point, the British Empire seemed to own the whole world.Of course, it later stopped, for various reasons. What I mean is, the expansion of human political entities is a major trend.It has ups and downs — times when it shrinks and times when it grows.Right now, it’s in a period of decline.But I think it will soon increase again.Russia (the Soviet Union) collapsed — the Soviet Union was once the largest.That’s true.But overall, the trend is toward expansion. And there is only one reason that prevents the expansion of human political entities What is it?Only one material condition: inconvenient transportation and communication, which makes it impossible to govern a large region.That is the only material condition that prevents expansion.There is no second condition. The current stagnation has to do with the mutual deterrence of nuclear weapons,and with the fact that people have not yet reached a consensus. Once a consensus is formed, human unification is possible.There are too many examples in history.For instance, East and West Germany naturally reunified.The United States originally had thirteen states,and those thirteen states voluntarily united.There have been cases of voluntary unification. So, the key is to clearly explain to all of humanity the rationale that Great Unification must be achieved. Levitt: You mentioned that human groups are getting larger and larger — I agree with that. But if we want to stop technological development, we need an entity to take on this role. For example, look at two large political entities like China and the United States — how many years will it take for them to achieve unification? Fifty years, a hundred years, three hundred years — we don’t know. But only after such a unified body is formed can we possibly restrict technological development; otherwise, the current technological competition is actually very fierce. Hu Jiaqi: I think you’ve hit on a core issue.Right now, I cannot answer this question precisely.But there is something I can do — something that would benefit this process, that would contribute to its formation. What is it? We need an awakening movement. In human history, (right now) we need an awakening movement.We need to explain this principle clearly to everyone.Once people have a general understanding of this issue,multiple unifying forces will emerge. Let me give you an example. I can casually design several scenarios that I think could help bring about the unification of humanity. Suppose that today, at this very moment, China and the United States firmly embrace this principle — then the two countries together would have a sixty to seventy percent chance of making it happen (referring to the Great Unification of humanity). If Russia is added, the chance rises to seventy to eighty percent. If India is also added, the chance reaches eighty to ninety percent. Just imagine: China, the United States, Russia, India.India has the largest population — even larger than China.If we convince these four countries,there is a very high probability of success.Not guaranteed, but very likely.And what’s more, these four countries are geographically connected. If all four agree, who would dare disagree?Small countries would be the most willing,because small countries are always being bullied.Just like when the League of Nations was established — everyone had high hopes for it. Which countries welcomed the United Nations?The five permanent members of the Security Council welcomed it, because they had special privileges.But the League of Nations was different.The League of Nations had no veto system, so it was the small countries that welcomed it most.Because small countries are constantly bullied by large ones,and they don’t want to remain in such an environment.So as long as this awakening movement is done well,promoting it is not difficult. Historically — and you, Professor, know Western history much better than I do,because I am from the East —there was the Renaissance period,there was the Enlightenment period.Without the Renaissance, there could have been no Reformation by Martin Luther.Without the Enlightenment, there could have been no United States of America —the first political regime in human history with separation of powers, right? So we need an awakening, an enlightenment.Now, our Humanitas Ark has been working on this all along.I have been doing this since I was seventeen years old.I have written letters to so many people, recorded so many speeches,and even tried to become the richest man —putting all my money into this —just to do this one thing. Ⅸ. Discussion on Artificial Intelligence Levitt: Let me ask you a different question.We are now on the era of AI, becoming more and more powerful.Will the power of AI make world unification easy, or more difficult? Hu Jiaqi: In fact, AI is like a sharp sword hanging over our heads.It could fall at any moment.AI is developing too fast.Yudkowsky came up with the alignment theory,and many people have praised and recognized it.But I am quite unimpressed with this alignment theory. Right now, alignment theory is the hottest topic.My view is this: this product might be alignable,that product might not be alignable.Even if all machines could be aligned,humans themselves are not aligned with each other.Many scientists deliberately do bad things.With the tools available, it becomes even easier to do bad things intentionally. There are plenty of people who want to destroy all of humanity.They just don’t have the capability yet.When a scientist has that capability,it becomes very easy for them to do it (to extinguish humanity) if they want to. So, does alignment theory have any use?It might help a little, but it cannot help much.So originally I thought Nick was my bosom friend,but now I no longer consider him as such. I can show you this slide about Nick Bostrom right here.I started researching this in 1979.I kept at it until 2007.The results of my research are these two books.After they were fully published, I sent them out to the world. Once they went out to the world, two extremes emerged.On one hand, some people supported me.On the other hand, the vast majority opposed me and even banned my books.Back then, when I said that technology could destroy humanity,people said I was worrying without cause. And then which year did things change?In 2013 — six years later — I suddenly came across a report.This report was led by Nick Bostrom of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University.He said something in that report— an official report, involving many scientists and philosophers He said that humanity could go extinct as early as the next century,and that the main culprit for human extinction is science and technology.That struck a chord with me. The report gathered many scientists, philosophers, and entrepreneurs for discussion.They said that humanity could be extinct as early as the next century,and the chief culprit for human extinction is science and technology.I was overjoyed when I saw that.I wrote him a letter and also sent him a book,but he never replied to my letter.The book should have arrived,because later when his staff came to Beijing, they specifically visited me.It’s just that he never wrote me back.And I published an article in a magazine and online, titled “Finally I’ve got a Bosom Friend.”I thought he was my bosom friend. But after all these years, looking back today, I realize he is not.Why?First, what he said today is different from his previous conclusion.He said that technology causing human extinction is highly uncertain.With such high uncertainty, you don’t need to worry about it.Second, he has introduced the alignment theory into his research.I think the alignment theory is just a small trick.Having this trick is not a bad thing,but it cannot achieve true alignment — it will never be fully aligned. What is his version of alignment about?I don’t know if the professor is familiar with this alignment theory.What does this alignment theory mean?It means that after artificial intelligence evolves from today’s weak AI to strong AI,AI will gain human-like thinking abilities, and then two types of mistakes could occur. The first is doing harm with good intentions.For example, you give it an instruction, and it follows your instruction,but ends up doing bad things with good intentions.Let me give you an example:It might think that the environment needs to be made perfectly clean,but since humans are the number one destroyer of the environment,it might decide to wipe out humanity.So that’s the first — doing bad with good intentions. The second concern is: What does it worry about?It worries that after AI develops to a certain point, it becomes incredibly smart.It looks at humans and thinks, “How can you be so stupid?””What I can compute in one second would take you a thousand years.”Then it will look down on humans.Higher species despise lower species, and even treat lower species as food — that is an iron law of nature.So it will rebel. Levitt: Let me ask you a question: imagine this is a special button, and if you press it, all AI is frozen now. Would you press it? Hu Jiaqi: I would press it, but such a thing cannot exist — it will never happen. Levitt: If it is possible, would you press it? Hu Jiaqi: I would press it. Because even without it, our lives are already good enough.In fact, many people long for a life like the Peach Garden. Ⅹ. Discussion about the Future World Levitt: I think the reason people yearning for life in the Peach Park is that they don’t understand life in the park. There’s terrible disease, suffering, slaves, and terrible torture.I think everyone thinks that it was better 20 years ago or 100 years ago or 1000 years ago. That is because on mind they can’t imagine. They think of all the good things. If you would press the magic button, and maybe AI will save humanity. Maybe AI has the ability to bring us Peach Garden. Maybe AI has the ability to unite the world. Maybe because of AI, all the countries will become one. I don’t know. I’m just saying there is uncertainty. We cannot be sure that stop something now is right. Firstly ,it is impossible. I agree we cannot stop.But we cannot be sure that stopping is the right thing. Hu Jiaqi: Alright, let me answer this question. We have come from primitive times to today. We have seen many good things, but we have also seen today’s problems.Yet today we are faced with a problem that must be solved: humanity may soon be driven to extinction by science and technology.This is too big an issue. Faced with such a huge problem, we must solve it.Only by restricting science and technology to a considerable degree can this problem be solved.So the Peach Garden for us today is not a choice we make willingly — it is a forced choice. We have no choice but to do this. Of course, the future Peach Garden will be different from the Peach Garden of the past.We must incorporate into that Peach Garden the safest and best things from all of human history,not just oxen plowing fields and horses pulling carts — not that kind of Peach Garden.That is my design for the future. Since this is not the main topic today, I had not planned to discuss it at length.But since we have come to this point, let me say a few more words.Our future society should be a peaceful, friendly, equitably prosperous, and non-competitive society,where existing safe and mature technologies are widely disseminated across the globe.I believe that widely disseminating existing safe and mature technologies around the world would be more than enough to ensure that all of humanity enjoys prosperity and well-being. This has been validated on the land of China. China is a large country with over 1.4 billion people, yet its arable land area is smaller than that of the United States and even smaller than that of India. India has only one-third the land area of China, but its arable land is larger than China’s. Yet today, China is able to achieve food and clothing security because it has some fairly good agricultural technologies — and these agricultural technologies should be preserved. Also, technologies that pose no harm to the holistic survival of humanity — such as tractor plowing and combine harvesting — can also be preserved. The future Peach Garden is different from the Peach Garden of the past.The Peach Garden of the past was one that had not experienced the Industrial Revolution.But the Peach Garden of today, having experienced the Industrial Revolution,can discard the bad and keep the good.So it will be more than enough to ensure the prosperity and well-being of humanity.It is a garden we design ourselves — not a forced choice. Ⅺ. Discussion on the Issue of Happiness Levitt: I’m interested a lot in what makes happiness. And after thinking about what makes happiness for a long time, I realize that for happiness, you must have happiness, unhappiness, happiness, unhappiness. Because if you only have happiness, it isn’t good. So you need to have unhappiness, happiness, unhappiness, happiness, unhappiness, happiness. In this way, you can have a happy life. This is what I think. What do you think? Hu Jiaqi: I have my own definition of happiness.I particularly agree with what you just said: sometimes we are happy, sometimes we are not. I believe happiness is attained through pursuit and generated through comparison.If a person has no goals to pursue, it is difficult for them to experience happiness.Without comparison, they also lack a sense of well-being.For example, children in wealthy families who eat delicacies daily may lose their appetite,while a poor farmer who occasionally enjoys meat feels it is incredibly delicious. This is a form of longitudinal comparison.There is also horizontal comparison:For example, when I see others driving luxury cars and living in mansions,while I ride a bicycle to work and live in a small dormitory, my sense of happiness diminishes.Therefore, happiness first arises through pursuit. Second, it emerges through comparison. Moreover, the goals of pursuit vary at different life stages.For instance, during school, my goal was to achieve good grades and gain admission to a prestigious university.After graduation, I hoped to secure a good job.At my current stage, I need to support my children,and I wish for them to succeed.If my child were admitted to a renowned university, I would feel deeply fulfilled. Happiness arises through pursuit,At every moment, people have multiple goals.When does a person feel a sense of happiness in the pursuit of something? And when does the pursuit of other things bring pleasure rather than true happiness?When they make progress toward their primary goals,psychological satisfaction emerges, creating a sense of happiness. For example, if I recently lost my job, I would feel terrible and lack happiness.However, if a friend treated me to a delicious meal and offered comfort during this time,I might feel momentarily joyful and happy,but this is not true happiness—it is merely pleasure. So there are two points: First, happiness is achieved through pursuit. But what do we pursue?It is achieved when you gain something while pursuing your main goal at that stage. Second, happiness is achieved through comparison —it can come from comparing with the past, with future expectations,or with the people around you. Why did Stavrianos say that people today are less happy than people in the Paleolithic era?Because when ancient people compared, they felt very happy.Why?First, everything they saw was lower-level animals — even tigers and lions couldn’t beat humans. Because humans could just set a trap and catch them.So when they compared themselves to all the animals, they felt a strong sense of happiness.Second, they had a stable food source and plenty of leisure time.They didn’t have to constantly struggle to obtain food.They felt that going out to hunt one or two goats a day could feed the family for several days — that gave them happiness.They didn’t know about today’s world. If they had, that happiness would have been gone.So happiness is fluctuating.Happiness is gained when you achieve your main goal at different stages of life.For example, when people grow old, they mostly hope for filial piety from their children.When young, even if conditions are good, they may not feel happy.Also, happiness is achieved through comparison. This is my understanding of happiness. So what I envision is that (pointing to the PPT) , for a future society to achieve happiness, it should be a peaceful one — people should have a more peaceful state of mind.Don’t be anxious.If you see someone eating a piece of meat while you only get the bone, and you get upset — you’re just being hard on yourself.We should live in friendship, be kind to neighbors, and avoid conflict.Human beings have an eternal tendency toward conflict.Equitable prosperity. Why must we have equitable prosperity?A society with a huge wealth gap —it is inevitably one where a small minority is wealthy while the majority is poor.In such a society, only the minority are happy, and most people are unhappy.That’s where resentment toward the rich comes from.So we need an equitably prosperous society, (pointing to the PPT) as well as a non-competitive society. Today, science and technology produce such a massive amount of knowledge —every day, such a huge volume of knowledge forces you to learn and to compete.A couple together cannot even afford to raise one child — it’s all due to constant comparison. Therefore, I believe that a peaceful, friendly, equitably prosperous, and non-competitive society is the kind of society that most enables people to achieve happiness,and it is also the most stable society.So I believe thata society of Great Unification is one that can prevent human extinction,and it is precisely also a society that can achieve universal well-being for humanity. Ⅻ. Hu Jiaqi’s Struggle Journey for Humanity’s Cause Hu Jiaqi: Let me tell you the story of what I have done over the years.Why did I decide to dedicate my entire life to this cause? I come from a rural background.When I entered university, I didn’t even know about Einstein.Because at that time, it was the Cultural Revolution, and we had very little access to knowledge.After I entered university, I was exposed to many cutting-edge scientific theories.These cutting-edge technologies made me realize how immensely powerful science and technology are.Under these circumstances, I felt there was a question worth studying:Is it possible for the development of science and technology to drive humanity to extinction? When will it happen? Can humanity be saved? So I set a lifelong goal for myself. But after graduation, I was assigned a very good job — first at a research institute, then at a government agency.Other people were assigned to mines or factories.But I was determined to work on this cause.I kept at it.I’m very fortunate that our workplace is right next to the National Library.Whenever there was a holiday, I rushed to the National Library.But I still felt time was not enough, so I decided to “go into business”. At that time, I thought to myself: once I earned 500,000 yuan, I would stop.But in my first month, I made over 1 million yuan.A year later, I earned more than 10 million yuan.Back then, 10 million yuan was worth about what 10 million US dollars is worth today.In that first year alone, I earned that much.When I first went into business, my monthly salary was only 186 yuan.That meant I earned in one year what would have taken me thousands of years at my old job.So I felt very lucky and believed I had some talent for business. By then, I handed over the business to others—my colleagues, who still run it today.I completely withdrew from business operations and focused on writing at home. For six years, I was entirely devoted to writing. I wrote for ten years in total. When I finished the book Saving Humanity, I wanted to promote my work well, just like Nick Bostrom did. I reached out to many media outlets for promotion.But when the media started promoting my book, it was banned from sale.This happened in 2007. What could I do then?I began writing letters—to national leaders, scientists—and sent them copies of my book.Over the years, I sent out 12 batches of letters, totaling about 1 million.Around 800,000 were emails, 200,000 were paper letters, and I mailed out 10,000 copies of my book. By 2008, I built my personal website, which is searchable online and available in both Chinese and English. I thought that simply posting things online wasn’t enough, so I created a dedicated site for promotion.Later, as the Humanitas Ark (originally the “Save Human Action Organization”) formed, we launched another website.Now we have two dedicated websites: my personal one in two languages, and the organization’s site in over a dozen languages, promoting globally. I also published books in various places: in the U.S., Russia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.But the number of people who recognized my work remained small. The promotion results have never been ideal. What should be done? So I decided: I would become the world’s richest person.If I became the world’s richest, my voice would carry weight—like Elon Musk, who speaks with authority as the world’s richest person.I pooled all my money and launched several internet projects: Yi Lu Lao , Yi Ba Yi Ba Lao, and Zhi Jie Lao.The press conference of my first website was held at the Great Hall of the People.This press conference cost over four million RMB.In the end, I worked on the internet for nearly ten years. It was too difficult because of the first-mover advantage problem.I had burned through most of my money, so I couldn’t continue.What could I do if I had no capital left for anything else? Then I thought: since this couldn’t be done, since this failed, I would start an organization and use collective strength to push things forward.This organization already has over 13 million supporters (and has now surpassed 14 million).This is what I have done. Today’s event is also a new approach.Perhaps next month, I will invite another Nobel laureate.Top scientists from around the world need to reach a consensus — that’s what I think. XIII. Convergence of Key Ideas Hu Jiaqi: It has been 47 years since I started my research on human issues in 1979. During this time, there have been some points that align with my views. As I just mentioned, my book Saving Humanity was published in 2007. In my book, I proposed that extraterrestrials should not be contacted without caution.Two years later, Stephen Hawking raised the same issue.I even wrote a special article about this, titled “The World Is Crazy,” which was published in the Hong Kong magazine Frontline. In 2013, Nick Bostrom issued an official report stating that humanity could go extinct as early as the next century, and the culprit would be science and technology.I wrote an article specifically about this, titled “Finally I’ve Got a Bosom Friend.”I also wrote him a letter, sent it along with my book — but he never replied.However, when his staff came to Beijing, they did visit me. In 2014, Hawking said that AI could spiral out of control and cause human extinction.Hawking said this in December 2014 — which was seven years after I made that point. In 2017, Hawking said in an interview with The Times that we might need to establish a world government for regulation.That world government is exactly what we just called the Great Unification of humanity.He was a full ten years behind me on this view. Of course, today more and more people recognize that science and technology could lead to human extinction.But there are still two points that very few people agree with me on.What are those two points? First, science and technology must be strictly restricted. Disseminating existing safe and mature technologies across the globe would be more than enough to ensure that all of humanity enjoys prosperity and well-being.Second, humanity must achieve Great Unification and use the power of a world regime to control science and technology.
Beijing, China – In April, Auto China 2026 was held in Beijing, bringing together automakers, distributors, and media from around the world. As the only pickup brand under Geely Auto, Geely Riddara showcased the 2026 RD6 ECON, highlighting its product strengths and global strategy through a new model launch, a global partner event, and an international media test drive. Together with Global Partners, Reshaping the Ecosystem of Electric Pickups At the event, Geely Riddara unveiled the 2026 RD6 ECON, designed to meet evolving market needs, real-world use cases, practical functionality, and next-generation technologies. The model features an upgraded smart cabin system, deeper integration with energy and IoT platforms, enhanced intelligent power discharge capabilities, and seamless connectivity with dedicated drone systems. 51 dealer partners from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa attended the event. After experiencing the vehicle firsthand, many said the new model offers strong competitiveness and potential in overseas markets. Global partners also visited Geely Riddara’s Zibo Intelligent Manufacturing Plant, gaining insight into the brand’s advanced production systems and smart manufacturing processes. Its high level of automation and rigorous quality control help ensure product reliability and consistency, further strengthening partner confidence. Geely Riddara also showcased its new energy pickup ecosystem solutions, including a coordinated solution for electric pickups and agricultural drones, a smart inspection vehicle co-developed with DJI, the PSP380 30 kW mobile power station, and the OmniPower Stack Solution, integrating solar power generation, energy storage, power output, and new energy pickups into one system. A partner from Thailand noted that Riddara now offers broader solutions beyond traditional pickups. Global Media Test Drive: Strong Product Performance Earns Positive Feedback At Geely’s global media test drive event in Hangzhou, more than 200 media representatives from Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Africa attended. Participants experienced the RD6 camping conversion vehicle and test-drove the RD6 PHEV. Many were impressed by its powertrain, handling, and intelligent features. Media from Malaysia noted the RD6 PHEV delivers strong power and responsive control, offering a driving experience close to an SUV. China’s Leading New Energy Pickup Brand Expands Its Global Presence As the leader of China’s new energy pickup segment, Geely Riddara has ranked No. 1 for three consecutive years, with up to 98% pure electric pickup share. Globally, it has entered over 60 countries and regions, with growing sales and an expanding brand presence. Geely Riddara will continue to strengthen its product portfolio and technology platform, deepen collaboration with global partners, expand the use cases of its new energy pickup ecosystem, and deliver a more efficient, intelligent, and sustainable new energy pickup driving experience worldwide.
Singapore, 6th May 2026, ZEX PR WIRE — Valetax has appointed John Taylor as Chief Commercial Officer (CCO), a move aimed at reinforcing its global commercial framework and supporting the company’s next stage of expansion. John brings over 25 years of experience in global financial markets, with a background spanning senior leadership roles across Tier 1 investment banks and leading CFD brokerages. He has held board level positions including CEO, COO, CIO, and CFO, providing him with a well-rounded perspective on both strategic direction and operational execution. Over the course of his career, John has worked across more than 20 countries and has been involved in growth initiatives across regions including MENA, South Africa, Brazil, India, Europe, and Southeast Asia. His experience includes business expansion, cross-border integration, and the development of operations in high growth markets, as well as involvement in mergers and acquisitions and post-acquisition integration. In his new role, John will be responsible for leading Valetax’s global commercial strategy, with a focus on strengthening market structure, developing partnership networks, and aligning commercial initiatives with product and client experience priorities. Viktor, CEO of Valetax, commented: “Bringing John into the business reflects our continued focus on building a strong and disciplined commercial organisation. His experience across international markets and leadership roles will support our efforts to scale effectively while maintaining a clear strategic direction.” John Taylor said: “Valetax has established a solid platform, with a clear focus on technology, product, and client experience. There is a strong opportunity to further develop its commercial structure and expand its reach across key markets. I look forward to working with the team as the company continues to grow.” The appointment underscores Valetax’s commitment to strengthening its leadership team as it continues to expand globally and enhance its offering as a technology focused brokerage. About Valetax Valetax is a global multi asset brokerage delivering a technology driven trading experience. The company offers advanced infrastructure, competitive conditions, and scalable solutions for traders and partners, with a focus on transparency, performance, and innovation.
The new handheld shooter features improved water-resistant formula performance, precision application, and a flexible refill program designed to help homeowners manage pests more effectively. United States, 6th May 2026 - CREEPER DEFEATER today announced the launch of Critter Cannon 2.0, an updated liquid pest control dispenser engineered to give homeowners a more controlled and efficient way to manage unwanted pests without relying on harsh chemical pesticides. Building on the original Critter Cannon, the new 2.0 model introduces improved outdoor durability, enhanced application control, and an optimized plant-based formula designed for real-world conditions.Critter Cannon 2.0 was developed to provide a more precise and responsive pest control experience while maintaining a strong focus on safety for pets, families, and the surrounding environment. The system combines a rechargeable electric handheld sprayer with an upgraded liquid repellant solution designed to deter a wide range of common pests in targeted areas such as gardens, patios, fence lines, and property perimeters.“Pest control should be effective without being excessive or complicated,” said a spokesperson for CREEPER DEFEATER. “Critter Cannon 2.0 gives users a simple, controlled way to apply treatment exactly where it’s needed, with a formula designed to perform outdoors while remaining considerate of pets and the environment. It’s also a whole lot of fun to use!”The Critter Cannon 2.0 features a dual-capacity system, including a high-capacity drum and a smaller magazine, allowing users to adapt to different treatment sizes and scenarios. The device delivers consistent bursts of liquid repellant at the push of a button, offering more control and accuracy compared to traditional spray methods.At the core of the system is the upgraded Critter Cannon Ammo, an enhanced version of CREEPER DEFEATER’s plant-based pest control formula. The new formulation is designed to be more water-resistant, helping maintain effectiveness in outdoor conditions while reducing the need for frequent reapplication.The formula avoids synthetic pesticides as well as commonly used natural irritants such as vinegar, alcohol, and peppermint. Instead, it uses a blend of plant-based ingredients including lemon balm, frankincense resin, cedarwood oil, soy oil, thyme oil, and geraniol, a compound naturally found in rose oil. A mild soap aids in even dispersion, while vitamin E serves as the preservative.According to CREEPER DEFEATER, the upgraded solution is designed to deliver strong repellant performance while remaining safe for use around dogs and cats when used as directed, and considerate of pollinators and outdoor environments. The higher concentration of active ingredients is intended to provide improved performance compared to many conventional products that rely on harsher or more irritating components.To support consistent use, CREEPER DEFEATER offers a subscription refill program for Critter Cannon Ammo. This program allows customers to receive refills on a regular schedule, helping maintain treatment consistency without the need for manual reordering.The Critter Cannon system is assembled in the United States, reflecting the company’s focus on quality control and responsible manufacturing.CREEPER DEFEATER also continues to support a broader mission beyond pest control. Ten percent of company profits are dedicated to initiatives focused on combating online predators and supporting safer communities through prevention, education, and resources for individuals and families.Critter Cannon 2.0 is now available through CREEPER DEFEATER.For more information visit CREEPER DEFEATER online or email Hello@CreeperDefeater.com.ABOUT CREEPER DEFEATERCREEPER DEFEATER develops premium natural pest control solutions designed to help homeowners protect indoor and outdoor spaces using plant-based ingredients and smart application systems. The company focuses on creating products that balance effectiveness, convenience, and safety for people, pets, and pollinators.Media Contact:CREEPER DEFEATERMedia Relations DepartmentDallas, TexasWebsite: Visit CREEPER DEFEATER Media Contact Organization: Creeper Defeater Contact Person: Support team Website: https://creeperdefeater.com/ Email: Send Email Country:United States Release id:44765 The post Creeper Defeater Announces Critter Cannon 2.0, an Upgraded Liquid Repellant Dispenser for Targeted, Pet-friendly Pest Control appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
New Zealand, 6th May 2026 – Rising ant infestations are becoming an increasingly common issue across Christchurch and the wider Canterbury region, prompting concern among homeowners and businesses alike. Local pest control specialists at Complete Pest Control report a noticeable increase in service requests, particularly as changing environmental conditions create ideal breeding grounds for invasive ant species.Known for its diverse climate and urban development, Canterbury presents a unique set of pest control challenges. From residential neighborhoods to commercial properties, ants are finding new ways to infiltrate buildings in search of food, water, and shelter. According to industry experts, even the smallest cracks and entry points can quickly turn into full-scale infestations if left unaddressed. Property owners seeking reliable ant control services in Christchurch are increasingly turning to experienced professionals for fast and effective solutions.Complete Pest Control, a locally owned and operated company, has been at the forefront of tackling these growing concerns. With deep roots in Canterbury, the team has developed a keen understanding of regional pest behaviors and patterns. This local expertise allows technicians to quickly identify infestation sources, track ant movement, and implement targeted solutions that deliver consistent results—making them a trusted choice for Christchurch pest control services.“Christchurch properties are particularly vulnerable due to a mix of environmental factors and structural conditions,” said Chris Ryder, spokesperson for Complete Pest Control. “Ants are incredibly resourceful. Once they find a reliable food or water source, they establish colonies that can expand rapidly. Early intervention is key.”The company emphasizes that traditional, short-term pest control methods are no longer sufficient to combat the increasing resilience of ant populations. Instead, they advocate for an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach—a comprehensive, sustainable strategy that focuses on long-term prevention rather than temporary fixes.As registered members of the Pest Management Association of New Zealand (PMANZ), Complete Pest Control technicians are trained to apply IPM techniques that minimize environmental impact while maximizing effectiveness. This approach combines careful inspection, targeted treatment, and ongoing monitoring to ensure pests are not only removed but prevented from returning.“Integrated Pest Management is about working smarter,” Ryder explained. “We don’t rely on excessive chemical use. Instead, we identify the root cause of infestations and use precise, eco-friendly treatments that are safe for families, employees, and pets.”One of the key benefits of IPM is its proactive nature. Rather than simply reacting to visible infestations, technicians assess risk factors such as moisture buildup, food storage practices, and structural vulnerabilities. By addressing these underlying issues, property owners can significantly reduce the likelihood of recurring pest problems. This is why professional pest control Christchurch services are increasingly focused on prevention as much as elimination.The surge in ant activity has also been linked to seasonal shifts and increased urbanization, which disrupt natural habitats and drive pests closer to human environments. Warmer temperatures and fluctuating weather patterns further accelerate colony growth, making infestations more frequent and harder to control.Complete Pest Control encourages Christchurch residents and business owners to remain vigilant. Simple preventative measures—such as sealing entry points, maintaining cleanliness, and addressing moisture issues—can make a substantial difference. However, professional assessment is often necessary to fully eliminate established colonies.With a strong commitment to customer satisfaction and environmental responsibility, Complete Pest Control continues to provide reliable, efficient, and forward-thinking pest management services throughout the region. Their tailored solutions ensure that each property receives the specific care it needs, backed by industry expertise and local knowledge.As ant infestations continue to rise, the company urges property owners not to wait until the problem escalates. Early action, combined with a strategic pest management plan, is the most effective way to protect homes and businesses from costly and persistent infestations.For more information visit http://Completepestcontrolchristchurch.co.nz About Complete Pest ControlComplete Pest Control is a Canterbury-based pest management company dedicated to delivering reliable, efficient, and environmentally responsible solutions for residential and commercial clients. Being Canterbury born and bred, the company has developed deep local expertise in identifying, managing, and preventing a wide range of pest issues unique to the region. As registered members of the Pest Management Association of New Zealand (PMANZ), their certified technicians follow industry best practices and prioritize Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies. Complete Pest Control focuses on long-term prevention, using targeted, eco-friendly treatments that are safe for families, staff, and pets while ensuring effective and lasting results. The company is widely recognized for delivering dependable Christchurch pest control and specialized ant control Christchurch services. Media Contact Organization: Complete Pest Control Contact Person: Chris Ryder Website: https://completepestcontrolchristchurch.co.nz/ Email: Send Email Country:New Zealand Release id:44763 The post Ant Infestations Surge Across Christchurch as Experts Urge Smarter Pest Control Solutions appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
New service brand responds to rising demand for digital workplace planning, hybrid office systems and business-ready IT support in Hong Kong Hong Kong S.A.R., 6th May 2026 — MJPM has officially launched TechSpace, a new business focused on workplace technology solutions for companies setting up, relocating or upgrading offices in Hong Kong. The new service is now available and is designed to help businesses manage IT infrastructure, AV and video conferencing systems, security systems and cloud technology with better coordination from the start of an office project.Supporting Hong Kong’s push toward digitalisation and AI-ready workplacesThe launch comes at a time when digital transformation is moving further into day-to-day business operations in Hong Kong. In the 2026-27 Budget, the HKSAR Government said it would continue accelerating digital transformation and AI application across industries, while related public funding and policy initiatives are also reinforcing AI adoption and technology upgrading in the local economy. Against that backdrop, workplace technology is becoming a more important part of office planning, especially for businesses that want secure, scalable and future-ready operations.MJPM said it has seen growing demand in recent years from both Hong Kong businesses and overseas companies entering the city, many of which need more structured support for office technology delivery. Instead of leaving IT decisions until late in the process, TechSpace is positioned to bring technology planning into the wider office project earlier, helping companies reduce rework, avoid delays and prepare for smoother go-live.Built for the realities of Hong Kong office projectsWhat gives TechSpace a clearer Hong Kong angle is its focus on local project constraints. According to the company’s service positioning, Hong Kong office projects often involve landlord and BMO requirements, restricted work windows, communications-room limitations, multi-vendor coordination, relocation cutovers and compliance-driven documentation needs. TechSpace has been built around these conditions, combining IT and infrastructure planning with the practical realities of office delivery.“Too often, businesses only start thinking seriously about IT infrastructure, security systems or meeting room technology after key office decisions have already been made,” said Mo Chan, Founder & Managing Director. “That can lead to unnecessary rework, delays and risk. We launched TechSpace because more companies in Hong Kong need a partner that understands both the technical side and the practical realities of delivering these systems properly, especially in sectors where reliability and compliance matter.”Designed for finance, professional services and fast-moving businessesTechSpace is particularly relevant for financial services firms, professional services practices, fintech companies, regional headquarters, SMEs and office operators that need dependable systems and cleaner handover. Its service scope covers four core areas: managed IT and network infrastructure, AV and video conferencing, security systems such as CCTV and access control, and cloud technologies including Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Azure, AWS, backup and disaster recovery. The business also places strong emphasis on user training, documentation and post-implementation support.With the launch of TechSpace, MJPM is extending its role beyond office renovation into the infrastructure and systems that increasingly shape how Hong Kong workplaces function. Businesses planning a move, a new office setup or a workplace upgrade can now book a free tech assessment or contact the team for an initial consultation. About MJPMMJPM is a Hong Kong office design and build company providing workplace design, renovation, project management and related delivery services for businesses across the city. The company supports office projects with a focus on practical execution, coordination and quality handover. About TechSpaceTechSpace is MJPM’s workplace technology brand, providing Hong Kong businesses with IT infrastructure, AV and video conferencing, security systems and cloud solutions for office projects. The service is designed to support smoother technology planning and implementation for modern workplaces.Contact: WebsiteMJPM: https://mjpm.com.hk/ TechSpace: https://techspace.com.hk/ Email: MJPM: info@mjpm.com.hk TechSpace:ITsupport@techspace.com.hk Media Contact Organization: TechSpace Contact Person: Mo Chan Website: https://techspace.com.hk/ Email: Send Email Country:Hong Kong S.A.R. Release id:44761 The post MJPM Launches TechSpace Hong Kong to Deliver Office IT Infrastructure and Workplace Technology Solutions appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
The new upgraded system delivers smarter app controls, expanded coverage, faster setup, and a more advanced plant powered formula designed to help families reclaim outdoor living. United States, 6th May 2026 - CREEPER DEFEATER today announced the launch of Skeeter Weeper 2.0, the latest evolution of its smart mosquito fogging and misting system engineered to help homeowners defend outdoor spaces against mosquitoes and other pests without relying on harsh chemical pesticides. Building on the success of the original Skeeter Weeper system, the new 2.0 model introduces expanded smart functionality, enhanced treatment performance, improved convenience, and a refined natural formula designed for modern outdoor living. Skeeter Weeper 2.0 was developed to give homeowners greater control over pest management while prioritizing safety for families, pets, pollinators, and outdoor environments. The upgraded system combines app controlled precision fogging with a proprietary plant powered concentrate formulated to repel and eliminate mosquitoes, flies, gnats, fleas, ticks, no see ums, mites, aphids, and additional outdoor pests. “Outdoor spaces should feel relaxing and enjoyable, not overrun by mosquitoes and chemical heavy solutions,” said a spokesperson for CREEPER DEFEATER. “Skeeter Weeper 2.0 represents a major leap forward in smart outdoor pest defense. We focused on making the system more powerful, easier to use, and more compatible with the way families want to live outdoors today.”Among the most significant upgrades in Skeeter Weeper 2.0 is its enhanced smart control platform. Homeowners can activate treatments directly from their smartphones and customize misting durations from as little as 10 seconds up to two minutes depending on weather conditions, infestation levels, and pest activity. The system allows users to control treatments remotely, helping create a more flexible and responsive pest management experience. The new generation system also expands scalable yard protection. Each additional unit is capable of adding approximately 1,000 square feet of treatment coverage, allowing users to customize protection for patios, pools, gardens, fences, entertainment areas, and larger outdoor properties. Designed with simplicity in mind, Skeeter Weeper 2.0 installs in under 10 minutes directly out of the box, eliminating the need for complicated professional installation often associated with traditional mosquito misting systems. At the core of Skeeter Weeper 2.0 is CREEPER DEFEATER’s upgraded proprietary eight ingredient formula featuring Lemon Balm, Frankincense Resin, Cedarwood Oil, Soy Oil, Thyme Oil, Geraniol, Mild Soap, and naturally occurring Vitamin E. The company states the new, optimized formula is four times more concentrated than leading competitors while excluding common ingredients considered problematic for pets or pollinators, including vinegar, alcohol, garlic, peppermint oil, and citronella oil. The formula was specifically developed to align with EPA FIFRA 25(b) minimum risk pesticide standards and avoid synthetic neurotoxins commonly associated with conventional mosquito control systems. According to CREEPER DEFEATER, the system is designed to be pet safe, child conscious, garden friendly, and pollinator conscious when used as directed. Skeeter Weeper 2.0 also introduces improved treatment flexibility. Users can target mosquito activity during key peak periods such as dawn and dusk or activate treatments immediately before outdoor gatherings. The ultra fine mist is designed to settle and blanket the treatment zone within approximately five minutes, helping the formula reach hard to access areas including nooks, crannies, moisture collection points, dense landscaping, and other environments where mosquitoes and pests commonly breed and hide.Regular treatment cycles are designed to help interrupt mosquito breeding and reduce pest populations over time while maintaining short term protection for up to six hours depending on environmental conditions. As part of the launch, every Skeeter Weeper 2.0 system includes a complimentary on body bug spray and a free bottle of repellent concentrate with a refill plan purchase.The launch comes amid growing consumer demand for alternatives to harsh chemical pesticides.Skeeter Weeper 2.0 is proudly assembled in Dallas, Texas and is now available through CREEPER DEFEATER.For more information visit CREEPER DEFEATER online or email Hello@CreeperDefeater.com.ABOUT CREEPER DEFEATERCREEPER DEFEATER develops premium natural pest control solutions designed to help homeowners protect indoor and outdoor spaces using plant powered ingredients and smart application systems. The company focuses on creating products that balance effectiveness, convenience, and safety for people, pets, and pollinators. Media Contact:CREEPER DEFEATERMedia Relations DepartmentDallas, TexasWebsite: Visit CREEPER DEFEATER Media Contact Organization: Creeper Defeater Contact Person: Support team Website: https://creeperdefeater.com/ Email: Send Email Country:United States Release id:44764 The post Creeper Defeater Announces Skeeter Weeper 2.0, the Next Generation Smart Mosquito Fogging and Misting System appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
As the cryptocurrency market continues to grow in 2026, traders are becoming more cautious when choosing where to trade. With new platforms entering the space, questions around safety and legitimacy are more important than ever. One platform that has recently attracted attention is TGbit. But many users are asking: Is TGbit safe? Is it a legitimate crypto exchange? As interest in emerging platforms grows, understanding whether TGbit is reliable and secure becomes increasingly important. This review provides a clear and objective overview of TGbit’s features, security approach, and overall reliability. What is TGbit? TGbit is an emerging digital asset exchange focused on delivering a stable and accessible trading experience for global users. The platform supports derivatives trading and provides real-time market data across multiple devices. With a global-oriented approach, TGbit aims to build scalable infrastructure while offering multilingual support and cross-border accessibility. The platform appears to position itself for long-term development rather than short-term market entry. Key Features of TGbit TGbit offers several core features expected from modern crypto exchanges: Multi-device access via web and mobile Real-time market data and charting tools Derivatives trading for major digital assets Responsive and user-friendly interface The platform continues to improve its system performance and user experience as it evolves. Is TGbit Safe? Security is a key factor when evaluating any crypto platform. TGbit highlights several measures designed to protect users and maintain system stability. Risk control systems to monitor abnormal activities Identity verification (KYC) for account protection High-performance infrastructure to handle market volatility These features suggest a focus on operational security and platform resilience. However, as TGbit is still a relatively new exchange, its long-term reliability and full security architecture are still developing. Overall, TGbit demonstrates a security-focused approach, but like any emerging platform, users should remain cautious. As with any crypto platform, users are encouraged to conduct their own research before making decisions. Pros and Cons A balanced evaluation provides a clearer understanding of the platform. Pros Accessible globally with mobile support Available on both iOS and Android Focus on system stability and performance Supports derivatives trading Cons Relatively new platform with limited track record Security framework not fully transparent yet Still building long-term user trust Who Should Use TGbit? TGbit may be suitable for: New users looking for a simple and accessible trading platform Mobile-first traders who prefer app-based trading Users interested in derivatives trading Global users needing cross-border access As always, users should evaluate their own risk tolerance before using any trading platform. Final Verdict: Is TGbit Legit? Based on available information, TGbit appears to be a legitimate and developing crypto exchange with a focus on stability, infrastructure, and global expansion. However, as a newer platform: Its long-term performance is still being established Trust and transparency will continue to evolve over time TGbit can be considered a platform worth monitoring, especially for users exploring new trading environments. Conclusion As the crypto industry evolves, users are paying closer attention to platform security, reliability, and performance. TGbit reflects this trend by focusing on infrastructure, accessibility, and user experience. While still in its early stages, it is positioning itself as a potential competitor in the global crypto exchange market. For traders evaluating new platforms, staying informed and making cautious decisions remains essential.
Guangzhou, China – The 139th session of the China Import and Export Fair (Canton Fair), renowned as “China’s No.1 Exhibition”, has officially opened. As a core platform for China’s opening-up, this edition of the fair gathers 245,000 overseas purchasers from 219 countries and regions, establishing itself as a premier showcase for global advanced manufacturing and technological innovation. Deyee Robot (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd, an officially invited participant, presented a lineup of 5 AI-powered wellness and rehabilitation robots at the event, demonstrating the strong competitiveness of Chinese intelligent manufacturing in the global healthcare sector. Currently, AI and robotics technologies are driving a global industrial transformation, with China maintaining its position as a core global growth pole. As “China’s Robot Capital”, Shenzhen boasts a total robotics industry output value exceeding RMB 200 billion and an artificial intelligence industry scale of RMB 360 billion , making it a global hub for innovation. Leveraging this high-quality industrial ecosystem, Deyee Robot has grown into a globally leading benchmark enterprise in AI-enabled wellness and rehabilitation robots. Deyee Robot boasts distinct core competitive advantages: with core independent technologies including the self-developed Deep PT vertical large language model for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) physiotherapy, 3D human visual recognition algorithm, six-dimensional force control algorithm, and robotic arm motion control technology, the company’s product design integrates AI algorithms and robotics with six major TCM physiotherapy modalities and four categories of modern physical medicine. All products have obtained EU CE certification, ISO international certification, FCC certification and other authoritative qualifications, fully complying with global market access standards. The company’s 10 core product lines cover a wide range of application scenarios including overseas high-end wellness centers, beauty and care institutions, and star-rated hotels, effectively addressing key pain points in the global wellness sector such as shortage of professional practitioners, uneven service quality and high operational costs. A single Deyee robot can replace 3 to 5 professional physiotherapists, delivering both standardized and personalized services. Deyee has established an efficient supply chain system enabling “7-15 day fast delivery”, supported by lifelong free algorithm iteration and 7/24 global customer service, building a comprehensive competitive barrier. Until now, Deyee robot’s business covers more than 20 countries worldwide and over 300 cities across China, with a cumulative sales volume exceeding 4,000 units, serving more than 5 million person-times. The company records an 80% repeat purchase rate among overseas clients, and holds more than 60 national invention patents and over 50 national computer software copyright registrations. At the Canton Fair, Deyee Robot’ booth attracted enormous visitor attention, with thousands of global buyers stopping to experience the products. Its accurate TCM physiotherapy manipulation, intelligent AI interaction and comprehensive service support won wide recognition, and dozens of intent cooperation agreements were reached on site, making Deyee one of the most popular exhibitors in the sector. Looking forward, Deyee Robot will adhere to its vision of becoming “a globally leading embodied intelligent robot enterprise integrating AI and general healthcare”, continue to deepen core technology research and development, optimize its global service network, empower the upgrading of the global general healthcare industry with Chinese intelligent manufacturing, bring the services of Deyee AI wellness robots to every corner of the world, and contribute Chinese strength to global trade and the advancement of AI technology.v
Now Available on Amazon USA — Supporting Joint Comfort, Digestion, Skin Health & Daily Energy United States, May 2025 —Dauson has launched a new Ginger Turmeric Supplement Made in USA, now available on Amazon, designed for health-conscious Americans seeking a simpler and more effective approach to everyday wellness. Whether managing joint discomfort, digestive issues, low energy, or looking to improve skin health — this Daily Wellness Turmeric Supplement USA offers a powerful, no-fuss solution in easy-to-take capsule form. Who Is This Supplement For? This supplement is ideal for: Men and women over 30 experiencing occasional joint stiffness or discomfort Active individuals and athletes looking for natural muscle recovery support People seeking daily digestive comfort without harsh medications Anyone wanting healthier-looking skin and a stronger immune system Busy Americans who want wellness support without complicated routines A Smarter Alternative to Ginger & Turmeric Shots Millions of Americans try ginger or turmeric shots for their health benefits — but the strong taste, preparation time, and inconsistent dosing make it hard to stay consistent. The Best Turmeric Supplement on Amazon USA from Dauson Store eliminates all of that. Just two capsules a day — no prep, no bad taste, no guesswork. Each capsule delivers a standardized, clinically relevant dose so you get the same benefit every single day. What’s Inside? A Scientifically Backed Formula Every capsule is packed with premium, research-supported ingredients: Ginger & Turmeric (Curcumin): Powerful natural support for joints, digestion, and the body’s healthy inflammatory response — trusted for centuries in Ayurvedic wellness Piperine — Black Pepper Extract: Clinically shown to increase curcumin absorption by up to 6x, making every capsule far more effective than standard turmeric pills Vitamin D3: Supports strong bones, immune function, and mood — especially important for Americans with limited sun exposure Vitamin C: Boosts collagen production for healthier skin and powers your immune defense system Zinc: Supports metabolism, immune health, and overall vitality for sustained daily energy Quality You Can Trust Made & Tested in the USA As a certified GMP Certified Turmeric Ginger Capsules United States product, every batch is manufactured in a GMP-certified facility and independently third-party tested for purity, potency, and safety. Non-GMO. Vegan-friendly. No artificial fillers. No harmful additives. This is the quality standard American consumers expect — and deserve. Real Benefits. Every Day. As a trusted Natural Joint Support Supplement Made in America, consistent daily use supports: Reduced joint stiffness and improved mobility — move more freely every day Smoother, more comfortable digestion and gut health Healthier, glowing skin from the inside out Stronger immune defense against seasonal illness Sustained energy levels without stimulants or caffeine Best results are typically seen within 30–60 days of consistent use. Now Available on Amazon — Order Today The Ginger Turmeric Supplement Made in USA is available exclusively on Amazon for fast, convenient delivery across the United States. Click the link below to order today and start your wellness journey. Shop Now on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07NBCXNK9 Prime eligible | Fast US shipping | Easy returns About Dauson Store Dauson Store is an emerging wellness brand committed to delivering accessible, high-quality health supplements designed for modern lifestyles. Every product is developed with transparency, safety, and results in mind — making Dauson Store a trusted name for those seeking the Best Turmeric Supplement on Amazon USA. Media Contact Dauson Store Email: admin@dauson.in Website: https://dauson.store/
Jakarta, Indonesia, 6th May 2026, ZEX PR WIRE — Following a strong run of global editions that have consistently brought together enterprise leaders, policymakers, and investors, Trescon announces the Jakarta edition of World AI Show Indonesia alongside the launch of Finance 2045, scheduled for 7–8 July 2026 at Sheraton Grand Jakarta. The co-located platform is set to convene over 2,000 senior stakeholders for two days of focused dialogue, partnerships, and commercial outcomes. Indonesia’s rapid growth across artificial intelligence and digital finance sets the context for the platform. The country’s AI market is projected to exceed USD 10 billion by 2030, while its digital economy is expected to surpass USD 130 billion in gross merchandise value, driven by fintech, digital payments, and e-commerce adoption. The Jakarta edition of World AI Show marks the 47th global outing of the series and will host 1,000+ business and technology leaders, 30+ sponsors and exhibitors, 40+ speakers, and 40+ media and association partners, structured across 4+ thematic pillars. The platform is designed to move AI from pilot to production, with a clear focus on infrastructure readiness, inference costs, data integration, and governance frameworks as enterprises look to scale AI across core operations. In parallel, Finance 2045 makes its global debut in Indonesia as a dedicated platform for banking, FinTech, and enterprise finance leaders, bringing together over 1,000 attendees, including 500+ enterprises and SMEs, 300+ BFSI leaders, 100+ government policymakers, 100+ investors, and 40+ speakers to address capital flows, financial infrastructure, and market expansion across Southeast Asia. The co-location reflects a growing convergence between AI and financial services. AI is now embedded across payments, fraud detection, credit decisioning, risk management, and enterprise operations, making financial services one of the most active sectors for large-scale AI deployment. Bringing both platforms together creates a single, high-value environment where technology providers, financial institutions, and policymakers can align on infrastructure, regulation, and execution. Indonesia provides a strong backdrop for this convergence. With a population of over 270 million and a rapidly expanding digital economy, the country is scaling both AI adoption and financial inclusion at pace. Growth in digital payments, banking, and SME participation continues to deepen market activity, positioning Indonesia as one of Southeast Asia’s most dynamic economies. Aligned with the Golden Indonesia 20245 (Indonesia Emas 2045), the national vision to become a high-income, digitally advanced economy by its centenary year, the platforms connect national priorities with enterprise execution. By bringing together key ministries, regulators, and industry leaders, it moves beyond dialogue to enable real partnerships, investments, and large-scale AI and financial transformation initiatives required for Indonesia’s growth by 2045. The agenda across both platforms is built around execution. Discussions at World AI Show Indonesia will centre on scaling AI across enterprise environments, addressing infrastructure gaps, data readiness, and security, while aligning with emerging regulatory frameworks. Finance 2045 will extend the conversation across digital banking, embedded finance, tokenisation, SME financing, and sustainable finance, with a clear emphasis on investment opportunities and market access. With confirmed interest from leading banks, FinTech firms, global technology companies, and institutional investors, the Jakarta edition is positioned as a focused, high-value gathering for organisations looking to enter, expand, or strengthen their presence in Southeast Asia’s largest economy. About World AI Show World AI Show is a global conference series by Trescon that brings together enterprise leaders, policymakers, and technology providers to drive real-world AI adoption. With 45+ editions across key markets like Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and KSA, the platform focuses on enterprise use cases, infrastructure, governance, and measurable business outcomes, connecting decision-makers with the partners and solutions needed to scale AI. For free delegate passes, click here About Finance 2045 Finance 2045 is a global conference platform focused on the future of financial services, enterprise finance, and capital markets. Bringing together banking leaders, FinTechs, regulators, and investors, it addresses digital transformation, financial inclusion, emerging technologies, and investment flows, with a clear emphasis on partnerships, market access, and growth opportunities across high-potential economies. For free delegate passes, click here About Trescon Trescon is a global business catalyst and events firm that builds influential forums connecting governments, business leaders, investors, and innovators across FinTech, AI, sustainability, and emerging technologies. With a portfolio of flagship events including the World AI Show, HODL Summit, DATE, CARE for Sustainability, and the World FinTech Show — alongside managed events such as the Dubai FinTech Summit and the Dubai AI Festival — Trescon is known for catalysing bold ideas, strategic alliances, and real-world outcomes in high-growth markets. With operations spanning India, the UAE, and key international markets, Trescon connects businesses with opportunities worldwide. Media Contact Reeha Haris PR & Media Executive E: reeha@tresconglobal.com
CloudBasedBackup, a Luxembourg-based managed Nextcloud hosting provider, has launched annual subscription plans with 50% off for the first year, bringing its 500 GB plan to just €2.45 per month. The offering positions Nextcloud as a full alternative to Google Workspace or Office 365, combining secure file storage, collaboration tools, and workflow automation in one privacy-first workspace. The launch discount is available at cloudbasedbackup.com/en/pricing. Luxembourg, 6th May 2026 – CloudBasedBackup, the managed Nextcloud hosting provider built for privacy-focused teams and individuals, today announced the launch of its new annual plans. The provider will surprise customers by offering 50% off for the first year on yearly subscriptions, thus bringing its popular 500 GB plan to only €2.45 per month for the first year.With data privacy and control becoming a top priority for organizations across Europe and beyond, CloudBasedBackup positions its managed Nextcloud offering as a secure, flexible cloud solution that combines storage, collaboration, and productivity in one place.“Nextcloud is often thought of as cloud storage, but it’s much more than that,” said a spokesperson for CloudBasedBackup. “Our managed Nextclouds include a wide range of apps and collaboration features that can fully replace the day-to-day functionality many teams rely on from Office 365 or Google Workspace, while keeping control of data and reducing vendor lock-in.”CloudBasedBackup’s managed Nextcloud hosting is designed to make it easy to deploy and maintain a powerful cloud workspace without the administrative overhead. Alongside secure file storage and sharing, customers can enable apps for collaboration and productivity, including tools that support document work, communication, and workflow automation.The 50% discount applies to annual plans for the first year, including the 500 GB plan at €2.45/month (first year). Customers can view plans and secure a subscription at: https://cloudbasedbackup.com/en/pricingAbout CloudBasedBackupCloudBasedBackup provides managed Nextcloud hosting for organizations and individuals who want a secure, privacy-first cloud solution with automatic backups, collaboration tools, and simple administration. The platform helps customers consolidate storage and productivity workflows into a single flexible workspace without compromising data control. Media Contact Organization: CloudBased Backup Contact Person: Marc Schiwek Website: https://cloudbasedbackup.com/en Email: Send Email Country:Luxembourg Release id:44376 The post CloudBasedBackup Introduces Annual Subscription Plans for Managed Nextcloud Hosting appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
United States, 6th May 2026 — Outta PHX Print Shop, a leading production facility for DTF transfers and custom apparel in Arizona, has installed a new industrial five-printhead Direct-to-Film (DTF) printing system—significantly increasing output capacity and reducing turnaround times for high-volume orders.This latest investment allows the North Phoenix-based print shop to double its production capacity while maintaining consistent, high-quality results across all orders. The new system supports large-format DTF printing up to 24 inches wide and improves efficiency across gang sheet production, bulk apparel orders, and same-day service requests.With the upgraded system, production times have been reduced by approximately 50%, enabling faster fulfillment for local Phoenix clients and nationwide customers ordering through Outta PHX’s online platform.“This isn’t just an upgrade—it’s a shift in how fast we can deliver at scale,” said Bashar Dababneh, Owner of Outta PHX Print Shop. “We built our reputation on quality, and now we’re matching that with speed and capacity that most local shops simply can’t compete with.”The expanded production capabilities position Outta PHX Print Shop as a go-to provider for:High-volume DTF transfer orders DTF gang sheets with fast turnaround Apparel production for brands, events, and organizations Same-day DTF printing services in Phoenix The company continues to serve a wide range of clients, including local businesses, clothing brands, schools, sports teams, and promotional product distributors, while also supporting nationwide shipping for custom orders.About Outta PHX Print ShopOutta PHX Print Shop specializes in Direct-to-Film (DTF) transfers, DTF gang sheets, UV printing, Sublimation and premium custom apparel production. Based in North Phoenix, Arizona, the company offers fast local pickup and reliable nationwide shipping through its e-commerce platform. Media Contact Organization: Outta PHX Print Shop Contact Person: Brian Website: https://outtaphx.com Email: Send Email Contact Number: +16027023480 Address:420 E Bell Rd, Suite #7 Phoenix, AZ 85022 Country:United States Release id:44755 The post Outta PHX Print Shop Expands Production with New Five-Printhead Industrial Printer DTF System appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
Los Angeles, United States, 6th May 2026 — TM Group, led by founder Temirlan Tokobekov, announced plans for a major real estate development in Downtown Los Angeles with a total projected investment exceeding $300 million. The project marks a strategic step in the company’s expansion into the United States and reflects its ambition to deliver high-impact developments in globally competitive urban markets.The development will feature an iconic 55+ story condominium tower, designed to redefine the city’s skyline and establish a new benchmark for high-rise residential living. As demand for premium condominium residences continues to rise in major metropolitan areas, the project is positioned to meet evolving buyer expectations by combining location, design, and functionality into a single integrated offering.Located at 613 S Grand Ave, the tower is planned to include 300+ condominium residences, complemented by ground-floor commercial space and a curated selection of high-end amenities. These are expected to include wellness and fitness facilities, premium resident services, and lifestyle-oriented spaces designed to enhance the overall residential experience.The project is conceived as a fully integrated mixed-use environment, bringing together residential, commercial, and lifestyle components to create a dynamic urban destination. Its central location provides direct access to key business districts, cultural institutions, transportation networks, and entertainment hubs, positioning the development to attract both local and international buyers.The architectural vision emphasizes modern design, efficient use of vertical space, and advanced engineering systems. Sustainability will also play a central role, with environmentally responsible building practices and energy-efficient technologies aligned with current standards and market expectations. The development aims to deliver long-term value while establishing a distinctive presence in the Downtown Los Angeles skyline.“We don’t follow the market — we shape it. Los Angeles is the next step,” said Temirlan Tokobekov, Founder of TM Group.The project is currently in the pre-development phase, including architectural planning, feasibility analysis, financial structuring, and coordination with city authorities and consultants. As the development progresses through entitlement and approval stages, additional updates are expected, including design unveilings and project timelines.Upon completion, the project is expected to generate significant economic impact, including job creation, increased investment activity, and enhanced urban infrastructure. The development is positioned to become a key addition to the evolving landscape of Downtown Los Angeles.About TM GroupTM Group is a real estate development and investment company focused on large-scale residential and mixed-use projects, delivering high-quality developments across international markets. Media Contact Organization: TM Group Contact Person: Tim Website: https://tmgroup-ca.com Email: Send Email City: Los Angeles Country:United States Release id:44754 The post $300M+ Condominium Tower Planned to Transform Downtown Los Angeles Skyline appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.
Thailand, 6th May 2026 – Jewellery & Gem ASEAN Bangkok 2026 (JGAB 2026) has successfully concluded, marking another milestone achievement with 11,593 attendees from 80 countries worldwide. The four-day event has firmly established itself as a leading international trade platform and reinforced Thailand's pivotal role as the central hub for the jewellery and gemstone industry in the ASEAN region.High-Caliber Attendance Drives Business SuccessThe event attracted a distinguished audience of buyers, business professionals, and industry experts from across the globe. Over 55% of attendees were C-level executives and business owners, while 30% comprised distributors, importers-exporters, and jewellery designers. This high concentration of decision-makers underscores the event's reputation as a premier destination for serious business opportunities and international networking.World-Class Exhibition Showcases Industry InnovationJGAB 2026 featured more than 400 leading companies from over 15 countries, presenting a comprehensive range of products and services spanning raw materials, cut gemstones, finished jewellery, manufacturing technology, and innovation. The diverse exhibition facilitated dynamic business negotiations and trade matching throughout the event.Industry Leadership Perspective"JGAB 2026 has been tremendously successful in both visitor numbers and event quality," said Mr. Sornchai Numbunnam, General Manager of Informa Markets Thailand. "The continuous influx of international buyers reflects the global market's confidence in ASEAN's gemstone industry potential and Thailand's role as a vital regional trade center."Strategic International Market EngagementInternational buyers predominantly represented key growth markets including China, India, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Vietnam, and the Middle East. These strategic markets play crucial roles in the industry's future expansion and provide tangible opportunities for Thai entrepreneurs to scale their businesses globally.Beyond Commerce: Knowledge Exchange and InnovationThe event featured premium programming including The Gallery of Thai Silver, The Next Gem Contest, and the ASEAN Jewellery and Gem Summit 2026. These platforms facilitated knowledge exchange on market trends and innovations, significantly enhancing industry professionals' capabilities and competitive positioning.ASEAN Emerges as Global Jewelry Market HubThe overwhelming response from domestic and international participants highlights ASEAN's growing prominence as a global jewellery and gemstone market hub. This year's success reinforces Thailand's unique ability to seamlessly blend local craftsmanship with modern innovation, while opening new perspectives on growth opportunities in high-potential markets, particularly China and emerging secondary cities.Looking Ahead: JGAB 2027Building on this momentum, the organizers have announced that Jewellery & Gem ASEAN Bangkok will return May 17–20, 2027 at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC), Bangkok. The 2027 edition aims to fully establish the event as the "ASEAN Jewellery & Gemstone Sourcing Hub," encompassing trade, networking, and regional supply chain connectivity to global markets.The 2027 event will deliver enhanced experiences including:Focus on contemporary design, sustainability, and technology-driven business practices The 2027 event will deliver enhanced experiences through elevated buyer quality and targeted business matching activities, expanded seminar platforms featuring industry thought leaders, dedicated innovation showcase zones, and a strategic focus on contemporary design, sustainability, and technology-driven business practices.About Jewellery & Gem ASEAN BangkokJewellery & Gem ASEAN Bangkok is the region's premier trade event for the jewellery and gemstone industry, connecting international buyers with leading manufacturers, suppliers, and innovators from across ASEAN and beyond. The event serves as a comprehensive platform for trade, networking, and industry advancement.For more information, please contact:Informa Markets ThailandWebsite: www.jewellerygemaseanbkk.comMedia Inquiries:Email: Thunchanok@4h.co.th Tel. +66 96 415 1543 Media Contact Organization: FOUR HUNDRED Co., Ltd. Contact Person: Ms. Thunchanok Website: http://www.jewellerygemaseanbkk.com/ Email: Send Email Country:Thailand Release id:44717 The post JGAB 2026 Concludes with Record-Breaking Success: Over 11,500 Attendees from 80 Countries Reinforce Thailand's Position as ASEAN's Premier Jewellery and Gemstone Hub appeared first on King Newswire. This content is provided by a third-party source.. King Newswire is a press release distribution agency. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licences, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright concerns related to this article, please contact the company listed in the ‘Media Contact’ section above.